Radar sectionsDatabase
Check my site
WordPress plugin

Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks <= 2.0.10 — Missing Authorization to Google API key update

CVE-2024-6489Published · Updated

Action summary

Affected: ≤2.0.10Update to 2.0.11 or newer

All remediation steps
Severity
Medium5.3
CVSS
5.3
CVSS 3.1 · CNA (Wordfence)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
What does this vector mean?
AV:N Attack vector
Network
AC:L Attack complexity
Low
PR:N Privileges required
None
UI:N User interaction
None
S:U Scope
Unchanged
C:N Confidentiality
None
I:L Integrity
Low
A:N Availability
None
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Required access
No account needed
Exploit prediction (EPSS)
No score
CISA KEV
Not listed

Am I affected?

Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks getwid

  1. Affected≤ 2.0.10
  2. Patched in2.0.11

Update to 2.0.11 or newer.

You are affected if you run ≤ 2.0.10. Version 2.0.11 and later are not affected by this issue.

  • Check your version: in wp-admin go to Plugins → Installed Plugins and read the version under Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks.
  • No admin access? Run a passive check of your site. It reads public files only.
  • No account is needed to exploit this. Treat any exposed site on an affected version as at risk.

What to do

  1. Update to version 2.0.11, or a newer patched version
  2. Rotate administrator passwords and application secrets if the site ran a vulnerable version while publicly reachable.
  3. Watch Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks to get an email when the next vulnerability is published.

Advisory

Source description from Wordfence Intelligence, credited to Peter Thaleikis.

The Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the get_google_api_key function in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.10. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to set the MailChimp API key.

Exploits & references

Proof-of-concept & detection

No public proof-of-concept or detection template is known for this vulnerability.

Advisories & patches

More in Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks

All 14
More vulnerabilities in Getwid – Gutenberg Blocks
SeverityVulnerabilityCVEPublished
Medium6.4Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'data-image-points'
≤3.0.1Update to 3.0.2
CVE-2026-91862
Medium6.4Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Google Maps 'customStyle'
2.1.3 – 2.1.3Update to 2.2.0
CVE-2026-5924
Medium4.3Authenticated (Contributor+) Sensitive Information Exposure
≤2.1.2Update to 2.1.3
CVE-2025-58252
Medium6.4Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting via FancyBox JavaScript Library
≤3.59.4Update to 3.59.5
CVE-2024-5020
Medium6.4Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting
≤2.0.12Update to 2.0.13
CVE-2024-10872

Same weakness (Missing Authorization)

All Missing Authorization
Other Missing Authorization vulnerabilities
SeverityVulnerabilityCVEPublished
High7.2Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment User-Agent HeaderCVE-2026-120688
Critical9.8Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload via File Upload via Public Form SubmissionCVE-2026-125055
Critical9.8Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection to Remote Code Execution via 'form' ParameterCVE-2026-119077
Medium5.3Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Exposure in 'search' Parameter
Customer Reviews for WooCommerce≤5.127.0Update to 5.128.0
CVE-2026-121518

Timeline

  1. CVE published

    Severity medium, CVSS 5.3

  2. Record last updated

Sources & licenses

Wordfence record
Vulnerability data
Wordfence Intelligence. [object Object] Licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0.
CVE® identifiers
[object Object]. Used under the CVE Program. CVE® is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.
CVSS / CWE
National Vulnerability Database (NVD), shown unmodified. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
VulnCrest content
Summary, remediation guidance and page layout © VulnCrest. Not sourced from NVD.

How we use these sources

Search VulnCrest Radar

Are you sure?